<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EA Acquires Major Facebook Game Developer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gbgames.com/blog/2009/11/ea-acquires-major-facebook-game-developer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gbgames.com/blog/2009/11/ea-acquires-major-facebook-game-developer/</link>
	<description>An Indie Game Developer's somewhat interesting thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:27:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CodeJustin</title>
		<link>http://gbgames.com/blog/2009/11/ea-acquires-major-facebook-game-developer/comment-page-1/#comment-58379</link>
		<dc:creator>CodeJustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gbgames.com/blog/?p=1010#comment-58379</guid>
		<description>Gesh,  $400 is a lot of dough.

Wonder if the people that sell the company can always start another game company right after, lol?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gesh,  $400 is a lot of dough.</p>
<p>Wonder if the people that sell the company can always start another game company right after, lol?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Carlton</title>
		<link>http://gbgames.com/blog/2009/11/ea-acquires-major-facebook-game-developer/comment-page-1/#comment-58378</link>
		<dc:creator>David Carlton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gbgames.com/blog/?p=1010#comment-58378</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m biased (since I work for one of Playfish&#039;s competitors), but I both hope and believe that EA isn&#039;t going to get most, or even a particularly large chunk, of the eyeballs and sales on Facebook.  Their cultural DNA is based on standalone big sellers, and I don&#039;t see any reason why that would transfer to success on Facebook; and I think it&#039;s more likely that they&#039;ll kill Playfish&#039;s cultural DNA than that either the reverse will happen or that the two cultures will coexist.

I could easily be wrong, though; maybe I&#039;m misinterpreting the books I&#039;ve been reading, maybe they&#039;re wrong, maybe Playfish&#039;s revenues are already large enough to give them real clout within EA.  And I&#039;m sure EA&#039;s execs have read the same books I have and are working on ways to mitigate those risks.  Still, both of EA&#039;s announcements over the last week made me happy as a competitor of theirs.  (But unhappy as a gamer.)

Great questions in the last two paragraphs of your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m biased (since I work for one of Playfish&#8217;s competitors), but I both hope and believe that EA isn&#8217;t going to get most, or even a particularly large chunk, of the eyeballs and sales on Facebook.  Their cultural DNA is based on standalone big sellers, and I don&#8217;t see any reason why that would transfer to success on Facebook; and I think it&#8217;s more likely that they&#8217;ll kill Playfish&#8217;s cultural DNA than that either the reverse will happen or that the two cultures will coexist.</p>
<p>I could easily be wrong, though; maybe I&#8217;m misinterpreting the books I&#8217;ve been reading, maybe they&#8217;re wrong, maybe Playfish&#8217;s revenues are already large enough to give them real clout within EA.  And I&#8217;m sure EA&#8217;s execs have read the same books I have and are working on ways to mitigate those risks.  Still, both of EA&#8217;s announcements over the last week made me happy as a competitor of theirs.  (But unhappy as a gamer.)</p>
<p>Great questions in the last two paragraphs of your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

